Andy Lacey
andy at minstersystems.co.uk
Fri Dec 12 08:03:54 CST 2003
Thanks for the response Jim but as I said at the start that's just not practical. The system has far too many screens, reports, queries to even contemplate putting filters into them all. -- Andy Lacey http://www.minstersystems.co.uk --------- Original Message -------- From: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Subject: RE: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not Date: 12/12/03 19:53 May I suggest a filter form? When the user (an employee) accesses the database through the form, only the customers data is shown. If the user accesses the data through any other means all the customers data is available. A few changes to the queries should do the trick. HTH Jim -----Original Message----- From: Andy Lacey [mailto:andy at minstersystems.co.uk] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:27 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not Exactly. -- Andy Lacey http://www.minstersystems.co.uk --------- Original Message -------- From: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not Date: 12/12/03 11:11 Andy You need to show the real customer data to the specific customer while hiding all other data that is in the system for other customers? Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gustav Brock" <gustav at cactus.dk> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not > Hi Andy > > We have the same need. As it is close to impossible to create and > maintain a set of demo-data that mimics real life, we pick a copy of a > relevant client's data and "anonymise" these by renaming all customers > and other identifiable data (like employees' names and project names) > to fantasy names. > > /gustav > > > > Morning everyone. Poets day is with us again but in the meantime I'm looking > > for bright ideas here. > > > I have a biiiiig system here. I mention that it's big because any solution > > to this cannot involve changing every screen, report and query that's > > affected - far too much work. And the challenge is this: the users want/need > > to put selected parts of the system in front of customers. When they do so, > > however they do not want to show the names of other customers. So, for > > example, if they pull down a combo to select a customer they don't want to > > suddenly show that the customer's main competitor is also a customer. If > > they print a report of what the customer has received in the past 12 months > > they don't want to accidentally request All Customers and be embarrassed > > like that. In other words, in that situation, the system needs to be > > cast-iron certain to only ever show the details of one customer, or at least > > a controlled sub-set (may be more than one as the customer may belong to a > > group). > > > So my idea was that before the meeting one could run a process which would > > extract all data for the required customer(s) into an identical set of > > tables in another MDB then relink to that MDB. Not all tables would be > > affected. Look-up tables, for example, would still point to the live MDB. > > But there would be quite a few involved because I'd need the customer table > > plus all related ones. This approach sounds ok, and an appropriate set of > > queries wouild soon do it, but it has its hassles, such as changes to the > > table structures which would require me to either keep the copy MDB > > up-to-date as well as the live one OR to create the copy one from scratch > > each time - but then I've also got to create indexes and relationships too > > and that's quite a job. > > > Another idea I had, but I have to reject, was to rename the linked table (ie > > give it a different alias) then create a query with the same name as the > > table which filters the customers. All queries, screens and reports would > > then see that. But that's out because I use SEEKs on the customer table to > > access records quickly, and I can't SEEK on a query. > > > So, has anyone got a better idea? Or a simple way of resolving the issue of > > changes in the table structures (can you somehow clone a set of tables > > complete with all indexes and relationships)? > > _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com ________________________________________________ Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2 _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com ________________________________________________ Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2