[AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not

Martin Reid mwp.reid at qub.ac.uk
Sun Dec 14 03:04:39 CST 2003


Could you drop the combo and have them key in the company name then do a
filter?

Open a blank form?

Just bouncing ideas to avoid a rewrite

Martin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Lacey" <andy at minstersystems.co.uk>
To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'"
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 7:41 AM
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not


> No Martin that's just not so in this case. How, for example, do you use a
> combo to select something without displaying the records around the one
you
> need? It's not a training issue.
>
> Andy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Martin Reid
> > Sent: 13 December 2003 15:26
> > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not
> >
> >
> > Of course the simple appraoch is to train up the users.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andy Lacey" <andy at minstersystems.co.uk>
> > To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'"
> > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 5:44 AM
> > Subject: RE: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not
> >
> >
> > > No, but if I encrypt (ie scramble in a structured way) then I can
> > unencrypt
> > > that one and encrypt another customer afterwards.
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> > > > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav
> > > > Brock
> > > > Sent: 13 December 2003 12:02
> > > > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> > > > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Andy
> > > >
> > > > I see. But my idea wouldn't work if the sales person was visiting
> > > > several clients per day - except if all customers were
> > scrambled and
> > > > he brings a list telling which real customer, say, "McAllen &
> > > > Daughters Ltd." represents.
> > > >
> > > > /gustav
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Not sure what you mean by "mixed up" Gustav. Take one of
> > > > many screens.
> > > > > Here you can select a financial period and year; select a
> > > > customer or
> > > > > a customer group or leave blank for all customers, hit
> > Print and a
> > > > > report will show the orders for those criteria, a summary of
> > > > > expenditure, render it into GBP if it was export and so on.
> > > > And that's
> > > > > just one of many, many examples. Now the pitfalls are
> > that a) the
> > > > > sales person may/will drop down the combo to choose the
> > customer,
> > > > > thereby showing other customers or b) may inadvertently
> > select the
> > > > > wrong customer and print the report (and hand it over to his
> > > > > client before he realises his mistake - aargh!) or c) hit Print
> > > > > without selecting a customer and therefore list
> > activity for all
> > > > > customers. This is the sort of thing I'm talking about. And as I
> > > > stressed right
> > > > > from the start there are oodles of such situations in
> > the system
> > > > > so attacking each one individually is not an option.
> > > >
> > > > > At the moment I like your idea Gustav of deliberately
> > > > "corrupting" the
> > > > > rest of the data so that it's there but unrecognisable. If
> > > > I did that
> > > > > to selected fields (names, addresses, phone nos, email
> > > > addresses and
> > > > > so - not too many I don't think) I think that would do
> > > > nicely. I guess
> > > > > I could even do it by encryption so that it's reversible.
> > > > That way my
> > > > > on-the-road salesperson could "corrupt" all but one
> > customer, then
> > > > > un-corrupt all after first meeting and re-corrupt all
> > but a second
> > > > > customer when they get to the next place.
> > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Andy Lacey
> > > > > http://www.minstersystems.co.uk
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > --------- Original Message --------
> > > > > From: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
> > > > > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> > > > > To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
> > > > > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not
> > > > > Date: 12/12/03 13:44
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Andy
> > > >
> > > > > Hmmm ... but why are the data initially mixed up?
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > AccessD mailing list
> > > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/a> ccessd
> > > > Website:
> > > > http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > AccessD mailing list
> > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/a> ccessd
> > Website:
> > http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>



More information about the AccessD mailing list