Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Fri Feb 21 08:31:00 CST 2003
Hi Brett > I guess the burning question is this: Is it really necessary to have output > that is IDENTICAL to Acrobat? After all, I have seen Acrobat mangle up > certain documents, so is it really necessary to have a competing product > emulate that result? In some cases, yes. We use it for proof reading and approval of report layouts - and as templates, logos or preprinted paper mostly are output from pdf files as well, they must match. > I would like to hear the differences, though. We are about to purchase > licenses for all of our workstations (~50), and it would be nice to know > about any limitations before purchasing it. It was mostly the margins that were incorrect - up to one centimeter! /gustav > -----Original Message----- > From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk] > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:23 AM > To: Brett Barabash > Subject: Re: [AccessD] PDF for word ... > Hi Brett and Tom et al > Be careful with these. I did a test some months ago and none of them > (nor Win2pdf) created output identical to that from Acrobat. > For some cases any pdf is fine, I know, but for critical jobs it is > not. > /gustav >> How about PDF995 (www.pdf995.com)? Installs like any other Windows print >> driver, so you can create PDF files from any document just by printing to >> it. And under $10 bucks to boot! >> FYI - low price - $35 & $40. >> http://www.docauto.com/MakePDF.htm