Heenan, Lambert
Lambert.Heenan at AIG.com
Wed Jul 23 12:39:57 CDT 2003
After my hasty post I did some research on Bayesian filtering and it would appear to be the case that either the implementation of the filtering is bad, as you say, and/or the filtering system was not given a large enough sample of good and bad emails to work with when it was set up in the first place. Lambert > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Elliker [SMTP:delliker at hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:04 PM > To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com > Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT Wierd Bayesian Filters > > I don't think it's so much 'idiotic prudism' as crappy algorithmism. This > whole cyberspace deal is so new....it's actually a great opportunity, if > you can just get a handle on something that's needed (like really accurate > and good filters). > _D > > > > > > "Things are only free to the extent that you don't pay for them".-Don > Elliker > >From: "Wortz, Charles" > >Reply-To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > >To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" > >Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT Wierd Bayesian Filters > >Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:34:47 -0500 > > > >The problem is those in decision-making positions find it easier to > >punish all of us than to hunt down the few that are guilty. Just like > >the teacher that keeps the whole class after school instead of going to > >the trouble to find out which student was the one that caused whatever > >was the problem. > > > >Charles Wortz > >Software Development Division > >Texas Education Agency > >1701 N. Congress Ave > >Austin, TX 78701-1494 > >512-463-9493 > >CWortz at tea.state.tx.us > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Heenan, Lambert [mailto:Lambert.Heenan at AIG.com] > >Sent: Wednesday 2003 Jul 23 11:19 > >To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > >Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT Wierd Bayesian Filters > >Importance: Low > > > > > >Isn't it great when idiotic prudes rule cyberspace. Now we're getting > >legitimate communications censored because the word "H e x" sounds or is > >spelled a bit like "S e x". Or it is perhaps it's association with w i t > >c h c r a f t? What next? Blocking emails with words which are anagrams > >of other "sensitive" words? Who are these faceless idiots who deem what > >we can talk about anyway? > > > >Lambert > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Wortz, Charles [SMTP:CWortz at tea.state.tx.us] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:04 PM > > > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > > > Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT Wierd Bayesian Filters > > > > > > Charlotte, > > > > > > The reply had a word that rhymes with a forbidden word and differs in > > > spelling in only one letter from that forbidden word. You will need > > > to convince the blue-noses that the three letters h, e, and x spell a > > > valid word used in computer technology. > > > > > > Charles Wortz > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Charlotte Foust [mailto:cfoust at infostatsystems.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday 2003 Jul 23 10:50 > > > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > > > Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT Wierd Bayesian Filters > > > > > > Gah! Now I got one on my reply. > > > > > > Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. > > > > > > Place = Access Developers discussion and problem solving; ; ; Access > > > Developers discussion and problem solving Sender = Charlotte Foust > > > Subject = RE: [AccessD] OT Wierd Bayesian Filters Delivery Time = July > > > > > > 23, 2003 (Wednesday) 08:19:12 Policy = Inappropriate language Action > > > on this mail = Quarantine message > > > > > > Warning message from administrator: > > > Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. > > > > > > What on earth is it squawking about? > > > > > > Charlotte Foust > >_______________________________________________ > >AccessD mailing list > >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > _____ > > Protect your PC - Click here <http://g.msn.com/8HMRENUS/2755??PS=> for > McAfee.com VirusScan Online << File: ATT12041465.txt >>