Arthur Fuller
artful at rogers.com
Wed Jul 30 12:55:11 CDT 2003
They were written off the top of my head rather than pasted in, so I'll blame the Outlook compiler :-) And since sarcasm is my default stance, I can hardly call the kettle black. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: July 30, 2003 12:16 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] AXP: Report/Subreport parameters OW!! Arthur, please note that Gustav is the one to address the withering comments to. I was not the sarcastic one. <g> Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:05 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] AXP: Report/Subreport parameters Hi Charlotte Yeah, I too noticed the sloppiness from the hand of Mr. Static himself. And if you initially fire those functions _without_ a parameter, they return 1899-12-30 which may or may not be what you want; I would prefer that a non-specified date would be today's date ... but that, of course, depends. So Arthur, is this your new style - writing junior code - or did you experience a senior moment??? /gustav