[AccessD] Dang Bound Forms Again

Charlotte Foust cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Thu Jun 5 10:24:00 CDT 2003


That is true but doesn't seem as obvious to me if someone else were to
examine the design.

Charlotte Foust

-----Original Message-----
From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:21 PM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Dang Bound Forms Again


Hi Charlotte

Instead of inventing a false condition you can just state it:

  SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE False

/gustav


> Oh, you mean nothing in the recordsource, not no records returned by 
> it. So don't remove the recordsource, replace it with one that returns

> an empty recordset.  The way I do it is to use a standard recordsource

> that returns no records (i.e., "SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE 1 = 2").  
> That allows your form to be bound to the fields in MyTable but since 
> the where condition is always false, it returns an empty recordset.  
> Then I use code to set the recordsource to the appropriate one when 
> something triggers it such as a choice in a dropdown.

_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


More information about the AccessD mailing list