[AccessD] Updating queries with linked tables

Roz Clarke roz.clarke at donnslaw.co.uk
Mon Mar 31 10:00:32 CST 2003


Charles

Sorry for the vague. I am still a little wiped out from the weekend.

Access XP, SQL 7. It's a 1:1 relationship - how do I tell it that?! It's not
an update query as such, just a normal select statement behind a form.

Thanks

Roz

-----Original Message-----
From: Wortz, Charles [mailto:CWortz at tea.state.tx.us] 
Sent: 31 March 2003 16:43
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Updating queries with linked tables


Roz,

Are you saying you have an Access db (version?) with a local table and a
link to a table in SQL Server (version?) and you are trying to update both
in one update query?  If so, remember that the rules of updating generally
do not allow the updating of the one side of a one-to-many relationship.  If
you do have a one-to-many relationship you need to use two update queries,
one for each side.


Charles Wortz 
Software Development Division 
Texas Education Agency 
1701 N. Congress Ave 
Austin, TX 78701-1494 
512-463-9493 
CWortz at tea.state.tx.us 
-----Original Message-----
From: Roz Clarke [mailto:roz.clarke at donnslaw.co.uk] 
Sent: Monday 2003 Mar 31 09:33
To: 'accessd at databaseadvisors.com'
Subject: [AccessD] Updating queries with linked tables

Dear all 
I have a SQL database which stores core information about members of staff
here - name, department, phone extn. etc. 
I need to publish this information out to several different departments, all
of whom need to be able to update the data. At the same time, they each have
local data requirements which have to be updated alongside the core data. I
was going to put these in Access databases and give each department it's
own. What I'm finding (and I can't believe I never hit this before) is that
although the SQL tables can be updated through the Access FE, and the local
tables can be updated, combine them and wallop, not updateable. Even if all
the key fields are included in the query. The amount of info is about 50/50
and it would be highly user-unfriendly to split the data onto separate
forms. Is unbound the only way forward??? TIA 
Roz 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


More information about the AccessD mailing list