William Hindman
wdhindman at bellsouth.net
Thu May 15 21:12:42 CDT 2003
...but did you note any parts? :) William Hindman ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arthur Fuller" <artful at rogers.com> To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 6:20 PM Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: VBA.Net collections > Offhand I see no wholes in your theory. > > A. > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Colby > Sent: May 15, 2003 5:38 PM > To: AccessD > Cc: VBA > Subject: [AccessD] OT: VBA.Net collections > > > I am looking at implementing some classes that have defined functionality > and properties. However the class also needs a collection to hold other > items (instances of a specific class. I read about the idea of subclassing > a collection to define the object that the collection can hold by overriding > the Add method. Is there any reason not to just go the whole way and make > the collection class my object class. IOW, add my methods and properties to > a subclassed collection class, naming the new class to MyObject. > > > _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >