Jim Lawrence (AccessD)
accessd at shaw.ca
Wed Nov 5 21:32:13 CST 2003
Hi John and Stuart: Not trying to re-kindle the bound/unbound debate but as most of my contracts are with the local provincial government and they have a specific rule. All databases with greater than ten users must be build on SQL technology. That technology extends to Oracle and sometime MS SQL and unbound forms. Therefore, I have little opportunity experiment with Access environments with a large user base. The closest I came to a significant bound Access database was a private client with just under twenty users but they moved their server to Linux and subsequently a MySQL BE. Maybe all these concerns with larger Access bound form applications, are part of a local urban legend, or Database companies and DBAs who wish to promote the myth to their own end but I for one have not had great memories with a couple of applications. Once burned...twice shy. My two cents worth Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 5:54 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: Corrupted database On 5 Nov 2003 at 20:26, John Colby wrote: > Jim, > > I have a client with ~30 users in the database (bound forms) from 8-5 daily > and have not had a single corruption in coming up on a year now. > Me too! (For a couple of years now) <VBG> Apart from that one, I have several others which regularly have ~10 users in them all day with no sign of corruption yet. -- Stuart McLachlan Lexacorp Ltd Application Development, IT Consultancy http://www.lexacorp.com.pg _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com