[AccessD] Redemption DLL WAS: Poll: How many versions...

Charlotte Foust cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Thu Nov 20 11:20:29 CST 2003


I tmight be simpler to write something to use SMTP instead.

Charlotte Foust

-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Barabash [mailto:BBarabash at tappeconstruction.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:16 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Redemption DLL WAS: Poll: How many versions...


Bobby,
Do you have any CDO links/resources that give examples of this? I'd like
to write my own royalty/license free version of this.  Then I could wrap
it into my own class, and maybe compile it into an ActiveX DLL to use in
my projects.  (Oops!  Sorry John)


-----Original Message-----
From: Bobby Heid [mailto:bheid at appdevgrp.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:07 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Redemption DLL WAS: Poll: How many versions...


Don't know about the first part, but you can use extended MAPI which is
in CDO (which is being phased) out to bypass the security thing.  That
is what Redemption is doing.

Bobby



-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Brett
Barabash
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:39 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Redemption DLL WAS: Poll: How many versions...


OK, I give up.
What's the big issue with installing a COM component on a user's
machine?

And a better question:
If you don't use the redemption DLL, how do you bypass the security
dialog? Or do you use the line a tech consulting firm recently handed
us: "The email warning dialog is for your protection.  It can't be
bypassed"  Uh huh...


-----Original Message-----
From: John W. Colby [mailto:jcolby at colbyconsulting.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:05 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Poll: How many versions of Access are you
runningononemachine? XPosted


Stuart,

The same reason I don't use it.

John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Stuart Sanders
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:06 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Poll: How many versions of Access are you running
ononemachine? XPosted


I have 97, 2000 (SP3) and XP (SP2) on my dev machine.  I use outlook XP
for email currently, but don't use automation.

I had considered giving this a look: http://www.dimastr.com/redemption/

Which supposedly works around the security patch, but is a com component
which needs to be installed on systems.

Stuart



> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John W. 
> Colby
> Sent: Thursday, 20 November, 2003 10:23 AM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: RE: [AccessD] Poll: How many versions of Access are you
> running onone machine? XPosted
>
>
> I have Access97 and A2K on one machine, and AXP on another.
>
> I use Outlook automation to send email and the SP3 for Office2K breaks

> outlook automation such that it asks for permission for every email 
> sent. SP3 fixed the screwup where XP breaks 2K but I simply can't 
> install it on my dev machine.  Thus XP on one, 2K on another.  And I 
> am NOT happy to have to
> do that!
>
> John W. Colby
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this email
message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be
the views of Tappe Construction Co.

Scanning of this message and addition of this footer is performed by
SurfControl E-mail Filter software in conjunction with 
virus detection software.

_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this email
message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be
the views of Tappe Construction Co.

Scanning of this message and addition of this footer is performed by
SurfControl E-mail Filter software in conjunction with 
virus detection software.

_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


More information about the AccessD mailing list