MartyConnelly
martyconnelly at shaw.ca
Thu Nov 20 12:11:25 CST 2003
One big issue , you might have to deal with, is the wild rolling of the eyes of network guys when you suggest installing a dll affecting security that has not recieved an imperitur from the local potentate. especially on locked down networks. Brett Barabash wrote: >OK, I give up. >What's the big issue with installing a COM component on a user's machine? > >And a better question: >If you don't use the redemption DLL, how do you bypass the security dialog? >Or do you use the line a tech consulting firm recently handed us: "The email >warning dialog is for your protection. It can't be bypassed" Uh huh... > > >-----Original Message----- >From: John W. Colby [mailto:jcolby at colbyconsulting.com] >Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:05 AM >To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >Subject: RE: [AccessD] Poll: How many versions of Access are you >runningononemachine? XPosted > > >Stuart, > >The same reason I don't use it. > >John W. Colby >www.ColbyConsulting.com > >-----Original Message----- >From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Stuart Sanders >Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:06 PM >To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' >Subject: RE: [AccessD] Poll: How many versions of Access are you running >ononemachine? XPosted > > >I have 97, 2000 (SP3) and XP (SP2) on my dev machine. I use outlook XP >for email currently, but don't use automation. > >I had considered giving this a look: http://www.dimastr.com/redemption/ > >Which supposedly works around the security patch, but is a com component >which needs to be installed on systems. > >Stuart > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John W. >>Colby >>Sent: Thursday, 20 November, 2003 10:23 AM >>To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >>Subject: RE: [AccessD] Poll: How many versions of Access are you >>running onone machine? XPosted >> >> >>I have Access97 and A2K on one machine, and AXP on another. >> >>I use Outlook automation to send email and the SP3 for Office2K breaks >> >> > > > >>outlook automation such that it asks for permission for every email >>sent. SP3 fixed the screwup where XP breaks 2K but I simply can't >>install it on my >>dev machine. Thus XP on one, 2K on another. And I am NOT >>happy to have to >>do that! >> >>John W. Colby >>www.ColbyConsulting.com >> >> >> > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom >they are addressed. >If you have received this email in error please notify the >originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this >email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. > >Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual >sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, >states them to be the views of Tappe Construction Co. > >Scanning of this message and addition of this footer is performed >by SurfControl E-mail Filter software in conjunction with >virus detection software. > >_______________________________________________ >AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > -- Marty Connelly Victoria, B.C. Canada