[AccessD] Re: Friday Humour, Alpha-Access comparison

Robert L. Stewart rl_stewart at highstream.net
Fri Oct 3 11:06:32 CDT 2003


Gee, does that mean that I can get my record of 6 hours from scratch to a 
fully working and deployed application in Access down to just over 1 hour 
if I use Alpha 5.

Now isn't that poetic.

;-))))

Robert

At 10:43 AM 10/3/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:30:26 -0700
>From: "Charlotte Foust" <cfoust at infostatsystems.com>
>Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: Friday Humour, Alpha-Access comparison
>To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
>         <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>Message-ID:
>         <E61FC1D4B1918244905B113C680BEA86312348 at infoserver01.infostat.local>
>Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
>ROTFL  Unbiased comparison indeed!  I wonder if the author ever built an
>Access database.
>
>Charlotte Foust
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk]
>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:22 AM
>To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
>Subject: [AccessD] OT: Friday Humour, Alpha-Access comparison
>
>
>Hi all
>
>Stumbled over all the missing features of Access?
>Well, you are not alone. Browse this unbiased comparison:
>
>   http://newsletter.alphasoftware.com/0031004.htm
>
>/gustav




More information about the AccessD mailing list