Susan Harkins
ssharkins at bellsouth.net
Wed Apr 7 07:36:28 CDT 2004
I guess the point I'm trying to make is that for every dozen different open source applications, there are 2 dozen different reasons why the author(s) decided to make it open source. None are right, none are worng, they just are. I don't think that this really captures the point I was going after, but it's the best I can do to explain it at 6:30 in the morning :) ==========The fact that you're up and able to type is impressive enough. :) I understand open source within the context you're speaking -- I don't understand it within a major corporation like MS. But what you're talking about is really just a natural evolution of freeware/shareware... You guys offer your stuff because you want to, not because you're forced to. As for the hair anology, you're comparing open source to charity, community good will, or philantropy. Developers have been giving it away for free since ... since always -- that's nothing new. Competitors and even governments forcing open source from other major producers isn't the same thing. I'm talking about the market forces, and government manipulation, at play right now that are forcing MS to take it all off. :) To me, producers and governments complaining about MS not going open code is a red herring -- and it's difficult to even apply the same logic to other industries. Even the recipe analogy doesn't really work -- but most intellectual property is protected to a degree. The question I guess -- after talking this through is does code NEED to be protected. I mean, realistically, what would I do with it even if I had it? :) I guess what concerns me the most about exposing code is theft -- not so much of the actual code but of the ideas in the code, but there again, can that really be protected anyway? I don't know. I've developed a really good chocolate chip cookie recipe using Splenda and a good butter substitute. If a company took that recipe and turned it into a best seller and didn't credit or pay me for it, I'd be pis*ed. Hope that analogy finally makes my position clearer. I will readily admit that I simply do not have the expertise to adequately do it justice, and if it's going to happen, it will. But, as I'm fond of saying, I don't get it. :) However, as long as whatever happens comes about through pure market forces, I'm OK with it -- have to be, that's the way it works. :) Susan H.