[AccessD] Naming Conventions

LOL.  That's really what a naming convention is, a method of how our brains
think through the process of coding.  Everyone thinks differently, which is
why naming conventions are always so 'debated'.

Let's adopt the Pirate Code philosophy from the Pirates of the Caribbean:

Firstly, you must be a coder for the Naming Conventions to apply.
Secondly, whether or not to include the incrementing counter after Next was
never part of our negotiations.
Thirdly, the Naming Conventions are more like guidelines, then actual rules.

Welcome aboard the AccessD List, matey!

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 8:44 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Naming Conventions


Hi Drew

> For i....
>         For j .....
>                 For k ....
>                         Lots of code....
>                 Next k 'Okay, done with k, let's take care of j
>                 Do something with j
>         Next j 'okay, done with j, let's increment i
> Next i

> I wouldn't put those comments in, just what I'm thinking in my head as I'm
> coding...

You made me worry for a moment ...

/gustav

-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com