[AccessD] Naming Conventions

John W. Colby jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Tue Aug 10 20:34:16 CDT 2004


>Actually, I find it easier to remember that I'm using I

Which is unfortunately the crux of the matter.  It's all about "I".
Programming is supposed to be about the client, THEIR software, THEIR
maintenance costs if you are hit by a bus.  NOT about "I find it easier to
remember".  

When I come in to maintain your software I don't have your memories to work
with!

John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of DWUTKA at marlow.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:16 PM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Naming Conventions


Actually, I find it easier to remember that I'm using i, then it is to
remember that I am using
lngSomeLongDrawnOutCompletelyMeaninglessToTheCompilerNameSoThatSomeoneWhoIsT
ooLazyToReadTheCodeLogicCanImpressAClientThatTheyKnowAParticularVariableRepr
esentsXYZ

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Scott Marcus
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 6:12 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Naming Conventions


There are plenty of other things that I would rather fill my mind with when
developing and debugging code than remembering in each line of code(in the
loop) that 'i' is the employee type and 'j' is the employee counter.

Wouldn't you agree that it is hard enough sometimes just to follow the logic
of the code you are working on let alone remembering these variable
interpretations?  

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Susan Harkins
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 9:39 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Naming Conventions


Just a slight aside here, but you're gonna have to read the rest of the
statement anyway -- if you're counting something, you still need the rest of
the statement to figure out the rest -- the variable name itself is NOT
going to give you all the information you need. You still need the rest of
the statement. Not a for or an against, just thought I'd mention it... 

Susan H. 

Even 'intI' means little more than 'i'. Like you said, something like
'intEmployeeCounter' is easy to understand. Just to be even more clear, take
the following into consideration...


-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com






More information about the AccessD mailing list