[AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?

MartyConnelly martyconnelly at shaw.ca
Tue Aug 17 16:36:26 CDT 2004


Not much in Access just problems with conversion dialog box and security 
hot fixes
Mostly for Word Excel and Outlook.

Office 2003 SP1 download
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=9C51D3A6-7CB1-4F61-837E-5F938254FC47&displaylang=en

List of changes
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=842532

Jim Hewson wrote:

>What did the service pack fix?
>Does 2003 have any major problems?
>Some folks on this list mentioned that when developing in XP they use A2K file format because of the bloat problem.  Is there any such problem with 2003?
>
>Jim
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Charlotte
>Foust
>Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:03 PM
>To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>Subject: RE: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?
>
>
>Yeah, but 2003 got a service pack within months .... Does that suggest
>how badly it needed that SP?? <VBG> 
>
>Charlotte Foust
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brett Barabash [mailto:BBarabash at tappeconstruction.com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:55 AM
>To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>Subject: RE: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?
>
>
>Ooh you forgot one:
>6) That spiffy dancing paper clip is absent from Access 2.
>
>We waited forever to upgrade our Access 2 apps, and even then we didn't
>upgrade to the newest version (2000 instead of XP).  It normally takes
>at least a year until a service pack fixes the critical bugs introduced
>with each new version.
>
>And I concur with Gustav.  Our remaining 2.0 apps run just as well on
>Windows XP (and they are immune from any 32-bit library upgrades that
>tend to break office applications).
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Francisco H
>Tapia
>Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:40 PM
>To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>Subject: Re: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?
>
>Gustav Brock wrote On 8/17/2004 11:19 AM:
>
>  
>
>>Hi Catherine
>>
>>As long as you don't see a compelling reason to do so, the short answer
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>is No.
>>
>>Even Access 2.0 (16 bit) runs nicely under Windows XP.
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>Reason's to upgrade your copy of Access:
>
>1) You like to donate to the help out the billionaire campaign
>2) You're running Ms Access 95
>3) You absolutely sleep better at night knowing all your software uses
>Activation Keys.
>4) That $400 is burning a hole in your pocket.
>5) and the final reason to upgrade your copy of Access is:
>   You dig the latest splash screen in the latest copy of Access.
>
>I can think of more reasons NOT to upgrade
>
>--
>-Francisco
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------------------
>The information in this email may contain confidential information that 
>is legally privileged. The information is only for the use of the
>intended 
>recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you 
>are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the
>taking 
>of any action in regard to the content of this email is strictly
>prohibited.  If 
>transmission is incorrect, unclear, or incomplete, please notify the
>sender 
>immediately. The authorized recipient(s) of this information is/are
>prohibited 
>from disclosing this information to any other party and is/are required
>to 
>destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled.
>
>Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
>except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be
>the views of Tappe Construction Co.
>
>This footer also confirms that this email message has been scanned for
>the presence of computer viruses.Scanning of this message and addition
>of this footer is performed by SurfControl E-mail Filter software in
>conjunction with virus detection software.
>
>  
>

-- 
Marty Connelly
Victoria, B.C.
Canada






More information about the AccessD mailing list