Francisco Tapia
fhtapia at gmail.com
Tue Aug 31 19:01:30 CDT 2004
For the record I think it was me who applied the term VLDB to his db :D. Even thow I've been my dept's DBA for the last 3 years, I have not run into any company database that touches the Millions of records, the only tables that I have that contain a near enough number of consequential tables, (auditing) On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:32:55 -0400, Arthur Fuller <artful at rogers.com> wrote: > Just to put things in perspective, JC, the first client of the people > who developed MySQL had 60M rows in their principal table. There are > lots of apps way bigger than that. I once had a client that was adding > 10M rows per month to the table of concern (this was an app recording > seismic activity from several hundred meters). I must caution you that > you should not use the term VLDB as loosely as you have been using it. > You don't know the meaning of VLDB -- not yet at least. You're beginning > to appreciate the turf, however. Once I bid on a project that had 100M > rows each containing a graphic file. Not to say that size is everything, > but IMO VLDB comprises at least a TB, and often many hundreds of TBs. -- -Francisco