Arthur Fuller
artful at rogers.com
Thu Dec 30 16:42:48 CST 2004
From you all-too-brief description, I'll guess that T2 and T1 have identical structures, and that any change in T2 supercedes any value in T1 (else it gets WAY complex). But supposing that I'm correct.... One interesting way to do this is is to JOIN the tables and present them columnwise, i.e. T1.C1, T2.C1, T1.C2, T2.C2 etc. so you can readily compare the diffs. You can add criteria to specify that T1.C1 <> T2.C1 and so on, so you only get the rows that are different in some respect. Once you have that and you like the output, it's pretty simple change it to an update query in which you set T1.Cx = T2.Cx. I might be missing the point (wouldn't be the first time), but in my defence your description of the issue was a tad sketchy. Arthur Nicholson, Karen wrote: >OK, so I am losing my mind. I have a QUERY that I am going to run to >update the records in my base table with records from my changes table. >I want to track which fields were changed from and to. Every example I >pull is form based and won't run because SOMEBODY sent me an Access 95 >example. Some of you weren't even born in 95. Aughghghgh! Any help >is appreciated, as usual. > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 12/28/2004