[AccessD] Next Version of Access 12 Musings on what might happen(RANT)

Charlotte Foust cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Wed Feb 11 16:09:13 CST 2004


True. But since Access is based on VB, it isn't likely that a compiler
would be created separately for Access, don't you think?

Charlotte Foust

-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart McLachlan [mailto:stuart at lexacorp.com.pg] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:34 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Next Version of Access 12 Musings on what might
happen(RANT)


On 11 Feb 2004 at 8:04, Charlotte Foust wrote:

> A compiled executable only runs when the runtime is in place.  That's 
> just as true of VB executables as it is of anything that might be done

> in Access.  Since you would still need to install the Access runtime 
> on a machine, what would be the point of an executable?
> 

Only true if you are using a half baked "P-Code" compiler like VB.

Any "true compiler" which compiles to machine code  doesn't require 
any form of runtime.




 
-- 
Lexacorp Ltd
http://www.lexacorp.com.pg
Information Technology Consultancy, Software Development,System 
Support.



_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


More information about the AccessD mailing list