Jürgen Welz
jwelz at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 26 13:18:45 CST 2004
Thanks Marty: This is for my former Employer - now Client construction company that does not run WordPerfect. I do have lawyer clients running Office 2000 though and will keep track of this tidbit because many run both Word and Wordperfect for their boilderplate. The other news is that the 97 - 2003 conversion appears to run without issue including automation code for Word, Excel, Powerpoint and Project. I haven't tested all aspects yet but those that I have seem to work without issue. A far bigger issue is that they are moving from an MS 2000 Windows to 2003 and the screen fonts are all much smaller. The result of that conversion is that much of my drag and drop pixel based code requires revision. For some reason the drag form now truncates in width notwithstanding that it uses a API calls to determine the width of the text using the actual screen font. The drag distance had a few constants that I hard coded that need to be revised or convert to API based dynamic code. The biggest conversion headache is that a number of fonts have been changed such that they exceed the screen realestate allotted at the original design time. The good news is that the new screen uses smaller screen fonts than the old so while the old and new applications run at 1024*768, the forms use only the left and top 2/3's of the screen. What seems to have messed up the most in the conversion is the fonts on tabs. Most of the other issues relate to ODBC to outside data sources that appear no longer to work. It does look like I can continue to use the Access 97 file ODBC and link data imported into a 97 container to the 2003 application. I'll give this a shot tomorrow. The downside is that I'll have to import into the 97 mdb whereas previously I had only to overwrite the prelinked file. A change in that file format from some kind of text file to a Pervasive SQL database file may yet cause some headaches as the software vendor advises that their ODBC still only works with Access 97 files. Ciao Jürgen Welz Edmonton, Alberta jwelz at hotmail.com >From: MartyConnelly <martyconnelly at shaw.ca> > >There is one caveat I have about Word 2003. If you have any lawyers using >it to reproduce or save in Word Perfect format, the conversion driver is no >longer there, You can read WP but not write WP type files. so you might >want to keep a copy of Word 2002 or 2000 hanging around. I know in the US, >you have to submit Superior Court Appeal documents in Word Perfect only. I >don't think Canadian courts are that fussy. >See >http://www.woodyswatch.com/office/archtemplate.asp?v9-n05 _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photos&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca