Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Tue Jul 13 12:03:13 CDT 2004
Yep. It spikes at the time we get the message, but it doesn't look like a leak, since it isn't crawling up gradually. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: Colby, John [mailto:JColby at dispec.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 8:41 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: RE: [AccessD] Out of Memory problems - AXP/WinXP Have you looked at task manager to see if the memory usage is inching upwards? -----Original Message----- From: Charlotte Foust [mailto:cfoust at infostatsystems.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 12:30 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] Out of Memory problems - AXP/WinXP Further to this, the low end machine it failing at nearly 5000 distributions over several days, while the others are blowing up at around 500 or 600 over some hours. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: Charlotte Foust Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 8:27 AM To: AccessD at databaseadvisors.com Subject: [AccessD] Out of Memory problems - AXP/WinXP I'm wracking my brains to figure out why an AXP application of ours exhibits different behavior on different but similar machines. We have an app that simply sits there and distributes reports, either by email, to a printer or to PDF files. It operates on a timer and checks to see if new data has been received. If it has, it checks the distributions configured and sends the reports. The baffling thing is that at some point, we get a "not enough memory" error that brings it to a halt. The brute force method is to shut the thing down and restart it. We could even do that automatically, but the trouble is we can't figure out what causes it. It does not appear to be memory leak and we've tried everything we can think of: tweaking the virtual memory, turning off file indexing, changing the interval, updating the jet service pack to 8, etc. It is very consistent on each machine, but the machines we can test it on don't fall over at the same point. The best performance comes from the machine with the least RAM, the oldest video card and the slowest processor, but all are running WinXP SP-1 and OXP SP-2. All the machines are P-4s, have 40GB HD and have some flavor of NVIDIA Getforce2 adapters. The best performance is coming from the 256 MB RAM machine with a 1.50 Ghz CPU. I'm tearing my hair out in handfuls, and I can't find a clue anywhere I've looked. Can anyone shed any light on this? Charlotte Foust -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com