Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Tue Jul 13 12:08:16 CDT 2004
We aren't testing the print part at this point, only email and PDF file distribution. Of course, the PDF driver is a printer, but we're stuck there. All the machines we're testing are Dells and we can't really switch video cards easily, but I'll keep it in mind as a last resort. I'm fixating on the video cards because it seems like the only explanation left. Actually, at least one of the machines with poor performance has additional on-board memory on the video card. That knocking you hear is my head beating againt the wall. ;-{ Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 8:39 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Out of Memory problems - AXP/WinXP Hi Charlotte You mention it yourself. It could be the video driver. Or the printer driver. If used for nothing else than running your reporting engine, try switching to plain VGA or SVGA or switch to a proven video card like Matrox or ATI. Also check the printer drivers. If printing via PCL try switching to Postscript. I'm have an app like this in my plans (and so did Steve?) and would be very interested if you could report back your findings. /gustav > I'm wracking my brains to figure out why an AXP application of ours > exhibits different behavior on different but similar machines. We > have an app that simply sits there and distributes reports, either by > email, to a printer or to PDF files. It operates on a timer and > checks to see if new data has been received. If it has, it checks the > distributions configured and sends the reports. The baffling thing is > that at some point, we get a "not enough memory" error that brings it > to a halt. The brute force method is to shut the thing down and > restart it. We could even do that automatically, but the trouble is > we can't figure out what causes it. It does not appear to be memory > leak and we've tried everything we can think of: tweaking the virtual > memory, turning off file indexing, changing the interval, updating the > jet service pack to 8, etc. It is very consistent on each machine, but the machines we can > test it on don't fall over at the same point. The best performance > comes from the machine with the least RAM, the oldest video card and > the slowest processor, but all are running WinXP SP-1 and OXP SP-2. > All the machines are P-4s, have 40GB HD and have some flavor of NVIDIA > Getforce2 adapters. The best performance is coming from the 256 MB > RAM machine with a 1.50 Ghz CPU. > I'm tearing my hair out in handfuls, and I can't find a clue anywhere > I've looked. Can anyone shed any light on this? > Charlotte Foust -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com