Rocky Smolin - Beach Access Software
bchacc at san.rr.com
Thu Jul 15 22:44:21 CDT 2004
Marty: Why couldn't they just go directly into the back end and open the table in design view? Rocky ----- Original Message ----- From: "MartyConnelly" <martyconnelly at shaw.ca> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 6:40 PM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Hiding Back End Design > I came across this today under the Access ORK.You might be able to hide > the design this way. > http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2000/three/65t3_9.htm > > Using the RunPermissions Property with User-Level Security > In order for Microsoft Access to display a table or query, it must read > the design of that table or query. As a result, in order for a user to > read and display the data in a table or query, that user must also have > permission to read the design of the table or query. > If you dont want your users to see the design of your table or query, > you can create a query and set its RunPermissions property to restrict > their access to this information. > Set it up and test against one of the access reengineering case tools > like Sparxs or EZDesign. > > Rocky Smolin - Beach Access Software wrote: > > >One of the great advantages of Access is that the user can work with the > >data apart from the front end app. It's transparency is a real marketing > >plus. So I'd like to leave the back end open. I think it will be > >beneficial. > > > >Rocky > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Andy Lacey" <andy at minstersystems.co.uk> > >To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" > ><accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > >Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 11:36 AM > >Subject: RE: [AccessD] Hiding Back End Design > > > > > > > > > >>I'm going to sound a dissenting voice here. I don't understand why Rocky, > >>who's no doubt sweat blood to develop his vertical app, should in effect > >>give his system away? Because surely that's what he'd be doing? The only > >> > >> > >way > > > > > >>doing a development like this makes sense is to get economies of scale by > >>selling lots of copies. Without that incentive vertical apps would never > >> > >> > >get > > > > > >>developed at all because, in the main, a single customer can't stand all > >> > >> > >the > > > > > >>development costs. And if you're going to put in the graft why shouldn't > >> > >> > >you > > > > > >>dream of making money on it, and why should you open yourself to being > >>ripped-off by people who can't be arsed to do the hard work themselves? > >>Sorry, don't understand. > >> > >>-- Andy Lacey > >>http://www.minstersystems.co.uk > >> > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > >>>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of > >>>DWUTKA at marlow.com > >>>Sent: 23 June 2004 18:30 > >>>To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com > >>>Subject: RE: [AccessD] Hiding Back End Design > >>> > >>> > >>>'Open source' should pervade into all areas of the > >>>information age. Music, programming, videos, etc. > >>>Unfortunately it will take a complete change in humanity's > >>>driving force....the accumulation of wealth. As long as > >>>people are trying to make a buck, it will be virtually > >>>impossible to get them to do stuff simply for the betterment > >>>of society. > >>> > >>>Drew > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>-- > >>_______________________________________________ > >>AccessD mailing list > >>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > >>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > >>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Marty Connelly > Victoria, B.C. > Canada > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com