[AccessD] OT: The Great Primary Debate

Charlotte Foust cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Thu Jun 3 14:57:50 CDT 2004


Personally, I'm not planning to overflow a small integer. <G>

Charlotte Foust

-----Original Message-----
From: DWUTKA at marlow.com [mailto:DWUTKA at marlow.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:01 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: The Great Primary Debate


Actually, I'm kind of surprised at the list.  We are talking about age
here, wouldn't we want to store that in a Long Integer numeric field?
Tsk tsk tsk.

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Scott Marcus
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 12:30 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: The Great Primary Debate


<55?  Drew, you of all people shouldn't advocate arbitrary upper limits!
How about 255?

Why stop at 255? In the future, science may allow one to live forever.
Since code never dies, it would be better to make this the largest we
can handle today.

Scott Marcus
TSS Technologies, Inc.
marcus at tsstech.com
(513) 772-7000



-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list