Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Thu Jun 3 14:57:50 CDT 2004
Personally, I'm not planning to overflow a small integer. <G> Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: DWUTKA at marlow.com [mailto:DWUTKA at marlow.com] Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:01 AM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: The Great Primary Debate Actually, I'm kind of surprised at the list. We are talking about age here, wouldn't we want to store that in a Long Integer numeric field? Tsk tsk tsk. Drew -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Scott Marcus Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 12:30 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: The Great Primary Debate <55? Drew, you of all people shouldn't advocate arbitrary upper limits! How about 255? Why stop at 255? In the future, science may allow one to live forever. Since code never dies, it would be better to make this the largest we can handle today. Scott Marcus TSS Technologies, Inc. marcus at tsstech.com (513) 772-7000 -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com