Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Mon Mar 1 11:36:56 CST 2004
Hi Jim > Yes I did. I'll check to see if they did. I just did a win98 > install got the #name? error which is good in that at least I've got > a platform to test against. I forgot, at Win 98 it can't be an admin rights' issue. Then it's probably because a reference exists on Win 98 but of a lower version than that on your development machine. Access is not very keen to accept a lower version of a reference. Either install the newer version of the reference on Win 98 or compile your app with the lower version of the reference. /gustav > Maybe your client installed it without Administrator rights - which > you probably did? > /gustav >> I just installed on an XP system here and the app worked. Some read-only issues that I believe relate to security on the machine I was on but the date functions all worked. >> I seem to recall some code in the archives that set references. I'll take a look there and see what comes up. >> Thanks again, >> Jim D. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk] >> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:32 AM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] A2K MDE Runtime Reference problem - URGENT >> Hi Jim >> The Date fields are the symptom only. >> The cure is to locate and reestablish one or more missing reference. >> Access will - and is quite good at it but not perfect - try to locate >> any missing reference in the current environment, thus adjusting the >> path for each of these references. >> Maybe Access succeeded when the MDE was moved to your platform >> (Win2000 and C:\WINNT) but failed when it moved "back" (Win 9x/XP and >> C:\Windows) at the clients. >> /gustav >>> The real mystery is that we have not changed or added any references. It just seems the date fields that have the problem.