[AccessD] Framework Discussion - Who's following this

1) B
2) C & D
3) Just started following.

Virginia

-----Original Message-----
From: John R. Porter [mailto:j.r.porter at strath.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:08 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Framework Discussion - Who's following this


1) c
2) b
3) b

John R. Porter
I.T. Services
University of Strathclyde
Faculty of Education
76 Southbrae Drive
Glasgow
G13 1PP
e-mail: j.r.porter at strath.ac.uk
Tel. 0141 950 3289


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Tina Norris
Fields
Sent: 09 March 2004 15:49
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Framework Discussion - Who's following this


1) - b
2) - b or c, depending on my current level of stress
3) - b, with full intention of moving on to c an d

Thanks, John, for being generous with your knowledge.  I truly 
appreciate the gift.
Tina

John W. Colby wrote:

>My objective with this discussion is to explain the concepts and
>implementation of frameworks in sufficient detail that anyone willing to
>learn can pick up at least a few new ideas, understand classes and how they
>can solve problems, understand withevents and how using them allows us to
>encapsulate entire subsystems into an object, and understand Frameworks and
>how and why they might be useful.  I know that this is a rather large
>objective, and that some of these subjects seem rather deep.  I am
>attempting to keep the details clean and uncluttered in the beginning so
>that you can not get bogged down in stuff not relevant to the specific
>subject of the specific post.
>
>In order to accomplish this objective I need to get a feeling for who is
>following this discussion and at what level.  Would everyone interested in
>this thread please answer the following questions:
>
>1) 	Interest Level
>	a) I already pretty much do what you are discussing, just wanted to
see how
>you do it.
>	b) I am extremely interested in this concept and subject, would
probably
>use it if I can figure it out.
>	c) I am interested and might start using some of this stuff.
>	d) Moderately interested, probably too much work for what I see
getting out
>of it
>	e) Marginally interested, probably never use any of it.
>
>2)	Understanding
>	a) I understand completely what is going on
>	b) I mostly follow what is happening but have a couple of things I
don't
>really understand
>	c) I am trying my best but can't really follow a lot of it
>	d) Hopelessly lost, want to understand but need you to slow down a
bit.
>
>3) 	Participation
>	a) I am scanning the posts lightly to just get the basics
>	b) I am reading it and attempting to follow the examples.
>	c) I am reading the posts and working through the included code, and
have
>downloaded the example database
>	d) I am reading and have downloaded the database, and have worked
through
>the examples in the database to see how this stuff works.
>
>I truly appreciate your participation.
>
>Thanks,
>
>John W. Colby
>www.ColbyConsulting.com
>
>
>  
>


-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com