[AccessD] Framework Discussion - Who's following this

Thanks John for all your work.

I have not been able to read your posts yet, been bogged down with other
projects and just returned from a trip.  As soon as I am caught up with the
400 backlogged emails I will read this.


B - EXTREMELY INTERESTED - I have an access 97 application that needs to be
brought up to 2003. While doing this I would like to streamline some of its
components.
C - skimming - hopefully once I really get to read it all it will be clear
c/d - once I get to it I will download and work with examples.


Thanks again for all your work
Patti

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John W. Colby [mailto:jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 01:44 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: [AccessD] Framework Discussion - Who's following this
> 
> 
> My objective with this discussion is to explain the concepts and
> implementation of frameworks in sufficient detail that anyone 
> willing to
> learn can pick up at least a few new ideas, understand 
> classes and how they
> can solve problems, understand withevents and how using them 
> allows us to
> encapsulate entire subsystems into an object, and understand 
> Frameworks and
> how and why they might be useful.  I know that this is a rather large
> objective, and that some of these subjects seem rather deep.  I am
> attempting to keep the details clean and uncluttered in the 
> beginning so
> that you can not get bogged down in stuff not relevant to the specific
> subject of the specific post.
> 
> In order to accomplish this objective I need to get a feeling 
> for who is
> following this discussion and at what level.  Would everyone 
> interested in
> this thread please answer the following questions:
> 
> 1) 	Interest Level
> 	a) I already pretty much do what you are discussing, 
> just wanted to see how
> you do it.
> 	b) I am extremely interested in this concept and 
> subject, would probably
> use it if I can figure it out.
> 	c) I am interested and might start using some of this stuff.
> 	d) Moderately interested, probably too much work for 
> what I see getting out
> of it
> 	e) Marginally interested, probably never use any of it.
> 
> 2)	Understanding
> 	a) I understand completely what is going on
> 	b) I mostly follow what is happening but have a couple 
> of things I don't
> really understand
> 	c) I am trying my best but can't really follow a lot of it
> 	d) Hopelessly lost, want to understand but need you to 
> slow down a bit.
> 
> 3) 	Participation
> 	a) I am scanning the posts lightly to just get the basics
> 	b) I am reading it and attempting to follow the examples.
> 	c) I am reading the posts and working through the 
> included code, and have
> downloaded the example database
> 	d) I am reading and have downloaded the database, and 
> have worked through
> the examples in the database to see how this stuff works.
> 
> I truly appreciate your participation.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John W. Colby
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>