Greg Smith
GregSmith at starband.net
Sun Mar 14 18:17:05 CST 2004
Hi Carlos! Yes! Please do. And thanks. Sorry about taking so long to respond... Greg Smith gregsmith at starband.net -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Alberto Alves Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:18 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Converting Access 97 to Access XP FE& BE On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:12:18 -0800, Charlotte Foust <cfoust at infostatsystems.com> wrote: > Unless you're planning on using ADO exclusively, DAO works just fine > in XP, and you still have to fall back on DAO for somethings anyhow. > XP has no problem with either CurrentDB or CurrentProject, and there > is a certain basic support for both ADO and DAO built into XP even if > you remove *both* the references. I recommend you go through and > specifically change your declarations throughout to DAO.Recordset, > DAO.Database, etc., both to remove any confusion the engine has and to > make it easier to spot them in your code. There are certain objects > that have the same name in both models, and without the specific > declaration, Access can get them mixed up and think you're trying to > use an invalid method or property. > > Charlotte Foust Hi Greg! I have a .PDF file about DAO to ADO conversion. It is 550Kb. May I send it you offline? -- ****************************** * Carlos Alberto Alves * * Child Neurologist * * Systems Analyst/Programmer * * Rio de Janeiro, Brazil * * mailto:caa at highway.com.br * ****************************** -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com