[AccessD] Converting Access 97 to Access XP FE& BE

Greg Smith GregSmith at starband.net
Sun Mar 14 18:17:05 CST 2004


Hi Carlos!

Yes!  Please do.  And thanks.  Sorry about taking so long to respond...

Greg Smith
gregsmith at starband.net 

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Alberto
Alves
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:18 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Converting Access 97 to Access XP FE& BE

On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:12:18 -0800, Charlotte Foust
<cfoust at infostatsystems.com> wrote:

> Unless you're planning on using ADO exclusively, DAO works just fine 
> in XP, and you still have to fall back on DAO for somethings anyhow.  
> XP has no problem with either CurrentDB or CurrentProject, and there 
> is a certain basic support for both ADO and DAO built into XP even if 
> you remove *both* the references.  I recommend you go through and 
> specifically change your declarations throughout to DAO.Recordset, 
> DAO.Database, etc., both to remove any confusion the engine has and to 
> make it easier to spot them in your code.  There are certain objects 
> that have the same name in both models, and without the specific 
> declaration, Access can get them mixed up and think you're trying to 
> use an invalid method or property.
>
> Charlotte Foust

Hi Greg!
I have a .PDF file about DAO to ADO conversion. It is 550Kb. May I send it
you offline?
--
******************************
* Carlos Alberto Alves       *
* Child Neurologist          *
* Systems Analyst/Programmer *
* Rio de Janeiro, Brazil     *
* mailto:caa at highway.com.br  *
******************************
--
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




More information about the AccessD mailing list