[AccessD] Framework Discussion - Another poll

Jürgen is correct I should have responded directly to John, sorry Jürgen,
etal!

I can see John's point of asking as this takes a lot of time and there
hasn't been all that much discussion on certain parts lately so it begs to
ask "is it worth him continuing the series". I think that it definitely is
and next time he needs to reaffirm that I hope I remember to reply directly
to him.

John B.

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Jürgen Welz
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:24 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Framework Discussion - Another poll


I read most posts at this list including those by John Colby as it is
usually possible to learn from others' trials and tribulations.

I think it would have been appropriate to place a

               no archive

in the original post for those who hit 'Reply'.  Why a second poll?  These
look like 'me too' in my inbox and as gratifying as that may be to John, I
would propose to moderators that responses to polls should require the no
archive term in the body of either the poll or responses.


Ciao
Jürgen Welz
Edmonton, Alberta
jwelz at hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Premium includes powerful parental controls and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=htt
p://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

--
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com