[AccessD] OT: Migration to SQL Server - sort of

Gustav Brock gustav at cactus.dk
Fri Mar 26 03:30:55 CST 2004


Hi Marty

Interesting article - recommended reading for those getting in touch
with "information islands".

/gustav


> Just a head's up with these types of GUID keys, they may start to 
> become, a lot more commonly used.

>  I was just reading a paper and methodology developed by IBM Global and 
> the Alberta Government for implemention of privacy legislation across 
> databases.
> In Canada this would address legislation like Personal Information 
> Protection and Electronic Documents Act, also known by the awkward 
> acronym PIPEDA, or something like HIPPA in the US, there is similar 
> legislation in UK and EU.

> http://sharp.gov.ab.ca/ppa/documents/AlbertaPrivacyArchitectureOverview.pdf

> The method  is a Privacy Taxonomy which provides a comprehensive scheme 
> to consistently label privacy-relevant objects and actions in an IT environment
> with an an Identity Key Scheme based on hidden Meaningless But Unique 
> Numbers (MBUNs) to be used over multiple databases in an organization.
> These MBUN's are going to be long unique keys possibly  a GUID.
> They will map things like a SIN and Drivers license  into a MBUN so 
> tables can be accessed or aggregated without giving access to an exact  
> individuals records.

>>Not exactly migration, but biggest issue I've had lately with Access
>>FE's to SQL 2k is that Access can't deal with GUID's.  You *must* make
>>all the queries that join on these types of fields  into views because
>>Access can't relaibly make these joins.




More information about the AccessD mailing list