Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Fri Mar 26 03:30:55 CST 2004
Hi Marty Interesting article - recommended reading for those getting in touch with "information islands". /gustav > Just a head's up with these types of GUID keys, they may start to > become, a lot more commonly used. > I was just reading a paper and methodology developed by IBM Global and > the Alberta Government for implemention of privacy legislation across > databases. > In Canada this would address legislation like Personal Information > Protection and Electronic Documents Act, also known by the awkward > acronym PIPEDA, or something like HIPPA in the US, there is similar > legislation in UK and EU. > http://sharp.gov.ab.ca/ppa/documents/AlbertaPrivacyArchitectureOverview.pdf > The method is a Privacy Taxonomy which provides a comprehensive scheme > to consistently label privacy-relevant objects and actions in an IT environment > with an an Identity Key Scheme based on hidden Meaningless But Unique > Numbers (MBUNs) to be used over multiple databases in an organization. > These MBUN's are going to be long unique keys possibly a GUID. > They will map things like a SIN and Drivers license into a MBUN so > tables can be accessed or aggregated without giving access to an exact > individuals records. >>Not exactly migration, but biggest issue I've had lately with Access >>FE's to SQL 2k is that Access can't deal with GUID's. You *must* make >>all the queries that join on these types of fields into views because >>Access can't relaibly make these joins.