John W. Colby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Fri Mar 26 15:23:46 CST 2004
Hey!!! And frameworks are useless too I suppose? <grin> John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of David McAfee (Home) Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 4:09 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] Lookup Fields in Table Design No Drew, its more like you shouldn't use bound forms, only unbound! :P <hey, its Friday> David -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of DWUTKA at marlow.com Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 12:29 PM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: RE: [AccessD] Lookup Fields in Table Design And like I said to Gustav, that is EXACTLY why I got into this thread. You can't really understand something, if you can't challenge stuff with a 'why not?'. And if the answer doesn't really wash, you need to drill down until you find the real 'why not', or until you find that you 'can'. It's like the SendKeys issue. Yes, Sendkeys has a bug, which causes the Numlock key to change state. WAY too many people say that you should NEVER use the SendKeys statement, unless it's a dire emergency. <snip> -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com