Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Fri May 7 09:32:12 CDT 2004
Hi Mark > Lol. I apologize...I think you're making the assumption that I have > existing relinking code already in place... Indeed, yes! > I don't:( This my first time at a TRULY multi-user app. Maybe I > need to be walked through this, but the built-in linked table > manager appears to use drive-letter mappings, not UNC. Follow the advice of Steve. > If I deploy the front-end to a person who doesn't have the same drive-letter > mappings, I get an error. > What I was looking for was an approach that > (1)mimics published relinking code, such as > http://www.mvps.org/access/tables/tbl0009.htm, > (2)forces UNC naming, yet > (3)doesn't include possible user intervention. That would be an "automatic" relinker but it wouldn't know where to find your backend except if you supply the (UNC) path within the application. If you relink using UNC path before deployment, this step should not be needed at all. /gustav > Hmmm .. I'm not sure I can follow you here - if you have the UNC path > it doesn't matter wether the user has a drive mapped to it or not. You > just need to relink with the UNC path. But why relink if you have > deployed the app linked to the UNC path of your choice? > /gustav >> Actually my situation is just the opposite. I know the remote server name, >> but the user may have that drive mapped to any letter. Therefore I would >> like to be able to relink automatically using UNC. I am not comfortable >> with the user manually choosing the location of the BE.