Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Tue May 11 10:30:58 CDT 2004
Arthur, You can do it the way you envision and shouldn't have a bunch of problems ... Unless you get tangled in replication. I've often built applications on this 3-database plan, but you need more robust code for handling relinking and testing the links, since testing only one database or relinking only one isn't enough. We do something similar with our commercial apps in this company, so I know it works on a broad scale. I must admit that I haven't tried it with MDEs, though, so maybe someone else can contribute on that point. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: Arthur Fuller [mailto:artful at rogers.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:10 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: [AccessD] Managing Lookup Tables I have been trying to devise a cool way of managing lookup tables v. "data" tables. I.e. PaymentTypes v. Payments. It occurred to me that I could maybe link to two different back ends, one containing only the lookup tables and the other containing only the data tables. What I don't like about this approach is that I tend to define everything I can at the table level -- Caption, lookup, validation criteria, etc. etc.. I know this is controversial, and I don't want to rekindle those threads. What I am wondering instead is, Suppose I link the front end to the data database, and then link it in turn to the lookups database. I'm going to build 3 toy databases to check this out, but I'm wondering if anyone can see any significant problems in this approach. My basic reason for wanting to do this is so that I can freely nuke all the data in the data database, while preserving all the data in the lookup database. Insights, advice, and cash donations appreciated :) Arthur -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com