Jim Lawrence (AccessD)
accessd at shaw.ca
Sun May 16 18:52:42 CDT 2004
To add to this point..... A table with names will not guarantee that a name is correct or unique; therefore a table with only that information can not be normalized. The only way that I have found it is possible, is if the full name with DOB as a minimum requirement and maybe SIN as added insurance. Even though a single SIN number should guarantee uniqueness, you are of course dealing with human data entry issues. My two cents worth. Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Martin Reid Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 1:51 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] normalization question Why would you have a table with only names? In my experience there is usually another qualifier? But I am sure someone here will come up with an interesting approach to this one. Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Susan Harkins" <ssharkins at bellsouth.net> To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 9:42 PM Subject: [AccessD] normalization question > If a table contains only names -- say first and last -- and you relate those > records to other tables -- how to you deal with real people with the same > name? I feel like I'm stepping off a cliff here... > > Susan H. > -- > _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com