Foote, Chris
Chris.Foote at uk.thalesgroup.com
Mon Nov 22 05:49:48 CST 2004
I agree with Kath (who described my preferred solution much better than I did :-O) Chris Foote > -----Original Message----- > From: Kath Pelletti [mailto:KP at sdsonline.net] > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 11:41 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Design Problem > > > Richard - I think if it was me I would only have one client > table, from what you have said, but with 3 separate fields there, eg. > > 'Job' table: > Job ID (autonumber) > RequestorID (related to Client ID in Client table) > PrincipalClientID (related to Client ID in Client table) > RecipientID (related to Client ID in Client table) > > 'Client' table > Client ID (autonumber) > Name details > Address details > > > The fields RequestorID, PrincipalClientID and RecipientID > would all relate to one Client table. > > That way all 'client' data would be stored in the one table > and never duplicated, and you would have the flexibility of > having any combination of the 3 fields in the Job table. The > only mandatory field (it appears) would be the RequestorID. > > HTH > > Kath