Dan Waters
dwaters at usinternet.com
Mon Sep 13 10:40:52 CDT 2004
Richard - I assumed that you had compacted, and hadn't thought of making this an MDE. Now that you've done that, try compressing with WinZip or something similar. Or, you can right-click the file, select Send To, then select Compressed (zipped) Folder. Might help! Dan -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Griffiths, Richard Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 8:37 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] MS Access to VB6 or VB.net Dan Its been compacted and mde'd - reports etc take up space (I know I could write a separate FE for reports but this is what I am trying to avoid - using VB and crystal allows new reports to be send quickly and easily for example) thanks Richard -----Original Message----- From: Dan Waters [mailto:dwaters at usinternet.com] Sent: Mon 13/09/2004 12:46 To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Cc: Subject: RE: [AccessD] MS Access to VB6 or VB.net Richard, I've recently seen that whenever I compress a database FE, the compressed size is 20% - 25% of its original size. This would make emailing a FE a bit easier. Dan Waters -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Griffiths, Richard Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:20 AM To: AccessD at databaseadvisors.com Subject: [AccessD] MS Access to VB6 or VB.net Hi Group After advice and thoughts. I have a piece of commercial software (library s/ware for schools) written with A97 FE and BE. I am about to rewrite and can't decide over VB6 FE/A2K(DAO) BE or VB.net FE / A2K BE.(reason for change to VB as opposed to MS Access is that the VB footprint will be smaller 1-2mb [easier to email/download and manage than my 12-13 mb Access FE]). On one hand the VB6 route will be quicker to develop (no learning curve) and I think to deploy. On the other hand VB.Net is the future (most likely!!)(and learning and developing in this will be more interesting and will spur me on) but I am concerned (mainly) about deployment as my users are not very IT literate and their pc's (at this time) are not up-to-date (some W95 many W98 32-64mb ram - I know .net is no go on W95). So deployment of .net requires not only the framework but they need minimal Data Access 2.7, IE 5.01, Windows installer etc also installed. But 6-12 months down the line I don't want to be in the posistion that having used VB6 to then consider rewriting in Vb.net. What I can't gauge here is how significant these issues are (and any other issues). So what I am hoping to get here is how you would approach this conundrum - tried and tested VB6 or new VB.net? Thanks Richard -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com