Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Wed Apr 20 13:20:20 CDT 2005
Hi Jim This brings back memories of past times when you had typists typing in figures they had no clue about what so ever - reading from hand written sheets which contained errors too. Charlotte's comment is very precise. This is a left-over from the days where a correction could take a week, where you typed nearly blind folded, and the only way to get a list to check your entries was to request a print and wait for that. Today it would be waste of time. Thus option #3. /gustav >>> JHewson at karta.com 04/20 7:51 pm >>> Has anyone done this before? I am working on a proposal and one criteria is to "provide for the entry of... data twice to ensure accuracy." I thought of three methods of doing this. 1. Create a table for the second data entry and then compare the record with the first table. Delete the record(s) of the second table when they match. 2. Use an unbound form for the second data entry and compare the results with the table to ensure they match then delete the data. 3. Recommend the second person print the record and compare the documents without doing a double data entry. Suggesting it would take less time and therefore save money. There is the issue of paper, printing, etc..... Thoughts! Thanks, Jim