Susan Harkins
ssharkins at bellsouth.net
Thu Apr 28 06:56:07 CDT 2005
Each "type" would be an individual record then. Sounds like you have a many to many relationship between your name table and your type table. Name 1 Doe John 2 Smith Mary Type 1 Contact 2 IssuedTo 3 IssuedBy 4 ClosedBy NameTypemm 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 2 1 4 2 4 This all means that John Doe has a Contact and an IssuedBy type; Mary Smith is a Contact and a ClosedBy type. The associate table, NameTypemm contains a foreigh key to both tables. Technically, the associate key doesn't need a separate primary key as I've shown -- you could use the combined foreign keys as a primary key. The second column in NameTypemm is the Name foreign key. The third column is the Type foreign key. Is this helping? Susan H. Susan H. Yes, the name of a person can fit into any or all categories. The Contact, Closedby, ReleasedBy, etc call all be the same person. ************ Virginia, I could be wrong, so take this with a grain of salt -- but it sounds like Contact, IssuedTo, IssuedBy, ClosedBy, ReleasedBy are categories that describe each person. Before we go any further, would a "name" entity have more than one category? Susan H. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com