[AccessD] OLEDB vs ODBC

Francisco Tapia fhtapia at gmail.com
Thu Apr 28 15:11:36 CDT 2005


yup that's exactly what I ment..

On 4/28/05, Jim DeMarco <Jdemarco at hudsonhealthplan.org> wrote:
> 
> We had security issues as well since we're scanning personal documentation 
> (birth certs, ssn's, etc.) which is how we came to store the docs as BLOBs 
> also.
> 
> I didn't write the app but was heavily involved in the architecture. We 
> used a consulting firm to create a scanning component that saves scanned 
> docs to the BLOB. Until yesterday I was of the belief that we we not storing 
> the entire BLOB but now it seems we are. I'm assuming that by "entire BLOB" 
> you mean TIFF (or whatever file format you choose) header and extraneous 
> data. The consultant had tested the component and assured us that each BLOB 
> would max at approx. 20K but using the DATALENGTH function James Barash sent 
> me I see that they are quite a bit larger than expected.
> 
> Is that what you meant?
> 
> Jim D.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Francisco
> Tapia
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:15 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OLEDB vs ODBC
> 
> I don't know...
> 
> While on this topic.... one of the department managers wants to begin
> archiving photo's with calls received in our customer support center. the 
> FE
> is an Access ADP, and generally i'm against storing images inside DBs and 
> would rather "upload" the image to a location on the server and serve it up 
> via Access but I'd need to restrict the folder for uploading so that users 
> couldn't use that as their personal drive either...
> 
> what method are you using Jim or do you Upload the entire BLOB into the 
> db?
> 
> On 4/28/05, Jim DeMarco <Jdemarco at hudsonhealthplan.org> wrote:
> >
> > Here's a good one for you. M$ has long been telling us to use OLEDB via 
> > ADO to access our SQL data. We've been doing just that and in researching 
> an
> > issue where some BLOB image data is pegging our server CPUs when 
> uploading
> > via remote network connections I found a KB article that mentions that 
> there
> > is a bug in the way OLEDB handles large amounts of BLOB data and that 
> the > ODBC drivers should be used instead.
> >
> > My question: Our application (thankfully) uses an n-tier architecture 
> and > all the data access is done via centralized components. I know using 
> ODBC
> > will require modding the connect string. Once we've got a connection to 
> the
> > database via ODBC will our existing ADO OLEDB code break? AFAIK we're 
> using
> > connection objects, recordsets and command objects. Is there a lot of 
> SQL > specificity in the way we would access these objects using OLEDB?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Jim DeMarco
> > Director of Application Development
> > Hudson Health Plan
> >
> >
> > 
> ***********************************************************************************
> > "This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named 
> > recipient, and may contain information from Hudson Health Plan (HHP) that 
> is
> > confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
> are
> > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the 
> > contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> > message in error or are not the named recipient, please notify us
> > immediately, either by contacting the sender at the electronic mail 
> address
> > noted above or calling HHP at (914) 631-1611. If you are not the 
> intended > recipient, please do not forward this email to anyone, and delete 
> and
> > destroy all copies of this message. Thank You".
> >
> > 
> ***********************************************************************************
> >
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> 
> --
> -Francisco
> http://pcthis.blogspot.com |PC news with out the jargon!
> http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More...
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> 
> ***********************************************************************************
> "This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named 
> recipient, and may contain information from Hudson Health Plan (HHP) that is 
> confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the 
> contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> message in error or are not the named recipient, please notify us 
> immediately, either by contacting the sender at the electronic mail address 
> noted above or calling HHP at (914) 631-1611. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please do not forward this email to anyone, and delete and 
> destroy all copies of this message. Thank You".
> 
> ***********************************************************************************
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 



-- 
-Francisco
http://pcthis.blogspot.com |PC news with out the jargon!
http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More...



More information about the AccessD mailing list