Heenan, Lambert
Lambert.Heenan at AIG.com
Thu Aug 25 15:12:38 CDT 2005
I totally agree. If you are going to the trouble of scanning zip file contents it makes no sense at all to rely on the file extensions. But even my shop's method has a gaping hole. If the zip file has encrypted files in it the scanner gives up, adds a message to the effect that the file was not scanned and passes it on to the intended recipient. Not such a good idea. Lambert -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Bartow Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:40 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: Zip files (was Logic issue) Which is the correct manner of scanning and hence my switch to ftp instructions, but your shop is ahead of the curve on this. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Heenan, Lambert But if you try to send a Zip file that contains an EXE file, that will be blocked. In addition, if you rename the EXE before adding it to the ZIP file it will *still* get blocked because the scanning s/w looks at the (renamed) EXE file and sees its signature first few bytes and detects the EXE that way. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com