MartyConnelly
martyconnelly at shaw.ca
Fri Dec 2 20:21:12 CST 2005
I was discussing something about this with Shamil about return codes
from shellexecute
around the beggining of last month.
It returns a long = 42 on normal termination but if you try to call say
Outlook and it is not installed properly
you get a "5" returned. These return codes are probably documented
somewhere in the Windows Platform SDK.
But I haven't looked.
lngRet = ShellExecute(0&, vbNullString, _
"mailto:" & strAddr & _
"?Subject=" & strSubj & _
"&body=" & strBody, _
vbNullString, vbNullString, vbNormalFocus)
? Welz wrote:
> Stuart:
>
> I'm not privy to the details. Apparently a number of hex numbers show
> up in the event log every time a a pee file fails to open regardless
> of how they tried to open it. I am told that details have been
> forwarded to the support department of the company that sold us the
> software. I was also informed that the vendor admitted that other
> users of the software have reported ShellEx problems. They have now
> specifically stated that they do not support launching via
> ShellExecuteA but they may by the next version.... It worked in the
> last versions all the way back to the DOS only versions (v3 through v9
> with over a dozen intermdiate numbers). They have suggested we check
> for a pee.dat file that is the effective equivalent of an ldb file
> left hanging by the Pervasive database engine. They may have a point
> as the problem is quite pervasive and perverse, but the application
> isn't crashing and we have yet to see a single pee.dat file.
>
> I had one user who was not able to open a file required today for
> closing a bid no matter how or how many times he tried to open the
> file. I finally had him go to a colleague who was able to open it in
> his session. I will not revisit this issue until the people
> responsible have it launching reliably from Explorer.
>
> I wonder whether they claim to be Windows compatible...
>
> Thanks to eveyone who has welcomed me back.
>
> Ciao
> Jürgen Welz
> Edmonton, Alberta
> jwelz at hotmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: "Stuart McLachlan" <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg>
>>
>> On 2 Dec 2005 at 9:18, Jürgen Welz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Access application generally has between 18 and 26 concurrent
>> users. I am
>> > told by the IT department that their logs show numerous errors at
>> the times
>> > when users fail to launch their .Pee files.
>>
>> Knowing *what* errors would certainly help in tracking down the problem!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lexacorp Ltd
>> http://www.lexacorp.com.pg
>
--
Marty Connelly
Victoria, B.C.
Canada