MartyConnelly
martyconnelly at shaw.ca
Fri Dec 2 20:21:12 CST 2005
I was discussing something about this with Shamil about return codes from shellexecute around the beggining of last month. It returns a long = 42 on normal termination but if you try to call say Outlook and it is not installed properly you get a "5" returned. These return codes are probably documented somewhere in the Windows Platform SDK. But I haven't looked. lngRet = ShellExecute(0&, vbNullString, _ "mailto:" & strAddr & _ "?Subject=" & strSubj & _ "&body=" & strBody, _ vbNullString, vbNullString, vbNormalFocus) ? Welz wrote: > Stuart: > > I'm not privy to the details. Apparently a number of hex numbers show > up in the event log every time a a pee file fails to open regardless > of how they tried to open it. I am told that details have been > forwarded to the support department of the company that sold us the > software. I was also informed that the vendor admitted that other > users of the software have reported ShellEx problems. They have now > specifically stated that they do not support launching via > ShellExecuteA but they may by the next version.... It worked in the > last versions all the way back to the DOS only versions (v3 through v9 > with over a dozen intermdiate numbers). They have suggested we check > for a pee.dat file that is the effective equivalent of an ldb file > left hanging by the Pervasive database engine. They may have a point > as the problem is quite pervasive and perverse, but the application > isn't crashing and we have yet to see a single pee.dat file. > > I had one user who was not able to open a file required today for > closing a bid no matter how or how many times he tried to open the > file. I finally had him go to a colleague who was able to open it in > his session. I will not revisit this issue until the people > responsible have it launching reliably from Explorer. > > I wonder whether they claim to be Windows compatible... > > Thanks to eveyone who has welcomed me back. > > Ciao > Jürgen Welz > Edmonton, Alberta > jwelz at hotmail.com > > > > > >> From: "Stuart McLachlan" <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg> >> >> On 2 Dec 2005 at 9:18, Jürgen Welz wrote: >> >> >> >> > Access application generally has between 18 and 26 concurrent >> users. I am >> > told by the IT department that their logs show numerous errors at >> the times >> > when users fail to launch their .Pee files. >> >> Knowing *what* errors would certainly help in tracking down the problem! >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lexacorp Ltd >> http://www.lexacorp.com.pg > -- Marty Connelly Victoria, B.C. Canada