[AccessD] [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re:WhyChangeFieldSi ze/wasCha nge FieldS ize

Bruen, Bruce Bruce.Bruen at railcorp.nsw.gov.au
Tue Dec 6 17:15:38 CST 2005


Then you must avoid at all costs the .Net documentation.



-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of
DWUTKA at marlow.com
Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2005 9:53 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re:WhyChangeFieldSi
ze/wasCha nge FieldS ize

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Couldn't agree more!

Though I'm sure some of my posts may be the same way.  For me, I know
why I 'wander' a bit.  I tend to learn 'relationally'.  So when I
understand one set of rules, the next set of rules are learned within
the original framework.  As new things are learned, it's applied
globally.  So when I describe how to do something, I tend to wander
through the 'relationships' a bit, to try and provide the same
background that I used to learn the process.  I hate solutions like
this:

To do XYZ:

Type ZYX

What I love are solutions like this:

To do XYZ, X is something or other, and the process to get to Y involves
This or That (click here for information about This or That).  Z is then
reached by the ABC process.  (Click here for ABC process information).

Example:

Type ZYX

When something is explained like that, it not only provides you a
solution to what you are looking for, but also allows you to extrapolate
other similar solutions, or even fine tune the example to better bit
your needs.

Solutions which don't explain the process involved, or don't provide an
working example, IMHO are just plain incomplete, and far less useful
then a complete solution.

One of the reasons I LOVE Access 97's help file.

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: William Hindman [mailto:wdhindman at bellsouth.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 4:37 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: WhyChangeFieldSi
ze/wasCha nge FieldS ize


...rather more obtuse than ambiguous :)

<etc>



This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient and may be subject to copyright. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and its attachments from your system. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. Any opinion expressed in this e-mail and any attachments is not an opinion of RailCorp unless stated or apparent from its content. RailCorp is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or any attachments. RailCorp will not incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly as a result of the recipient accessing any of the attached files that may contain a virus.



More information about the AccessD mailing list