Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Mon Feb 14 13:29:31 CST 2005
Hi Steve I find it a pity that competition fades away. By the way, couldn't you do it without the NOT IN (...) or temp table by - in your original attempt - not using joins but a simple WHERE S.CAS1<>T.CAS1 AND S.CAS2<>T.CAS2 AND etc.? Also, did you try the consistent/inconsistent updates setting? /gustav >>> erbachs at gmail.com 14-02-2005 20:12:17 >>> Gustav, This database is inherited. It was created back in the mid-90s in Paradox for Windows v. 5. I upgraded it to v. 8 without, to my shame, revising the primary keys of any of the tables that use that 4-part CAS key. Now I'm upgrading it again to Access. All I can say is, this is one of those queries that Paradox handled all right. I'm floored that I can't find a less cumbersome method in Access. OK, whatever sympathy I gained by my "inherited" story has just evaporated with my invidious comparison to Paradox, eh? Steve Erbach On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:22:23 +0100, Gustav Brock <Gustav at cactus.dk> wrote: > Hi Steve > > It is that it reveals you have no autonumber or similar primary key. > On this list people have been killed for less (well, maybe not ...) > > (Tip: Tell this database is inherited; then mood will shift towards > great sympathy) > > /gustav