Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Tue Feb 22 10:51:05 CST 2005
That's Ken Getz, Drew. He wrote a substitute, as I recall. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: DWUTKA at marlow.com [mailto:DWUTKA at marlow.com] Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 10:04 AM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: What are you lot doing now and then? In Access 97, there wasn't a native AddressOf function. I think Stan Getz wrote one (at least I think that is who wrote the one that I use in 97). In Access 2000 (and up), they introduced a native AddressOf function. Yippie! One slight drawback. When using it, if you go into the VBE, Access 'locks'. Now, how is that an improvement? <grin> Drew -----Original Message----- From: Gustav Brock [mailto:Gustav at cactus.dk] Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:54 AM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: What are you lot doing now and then? Hi Drew What is this goof up you are mentioning here about callback? /gustav >>> DWUTKA at marlow.com 21-02-2005 17:45:12 >>> Hmmm, you know, a few years ago, I would have completely agreed. But I have found many HUGE differences between VB and Access. Actually, Access 97, in some ways, is closer in capabilities to VB 6.0 then Access 2000+ is. (The main difference, I see, is the complete goof up that MS pulled off with the Callback capabilities.) -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com