pedro at plex.nl
pedro at plex.nl
Tue Jan 18 16:03:54 CST 2005
Hello Steve and Stuart, sorry that i didn't responce any sooner, but we had troubles with our network. I am glad that you now understand what i want. Steve its not your age, but my poor explanation. A few mails back i talked about the stdev on the result, that was wrong, i better could have given you a direct example. I had a hard time to understand why the genetic researcher needs the stdev. I can't give you an answer about this now, but when i have a meating with him, i will ask and let you know then. But now. You gave me an example of the calculation {So if the points are 8.4 and 9.3, the average is 8.85. The "standard deviation" would be 9.3 - 8.85 = 0.45.}. Steve your calculation is the stdevp. This calculation is for a whole population. But, i understand, that it doesn't matter. The calculation can't be done in access because it needs a field name. It it possible to write the two values each time to a temp field, do the calculations and write them then to the result table. - Pedro Janssen - From: Steve Erbach <erbachs at gmail.com> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:20:55 -0600 Subject: Re: [AccessD] complex query!! Stuart, O!, Ancient One! We are honored and humbled that you have descended from your extended care facility to help us in our dire need! >> I can see a possible use for it, it shows how alike the items are in each pair. << ...and one could graph the "alikeness", too, I suppose. I was going to modify the SQL statement I came up with for Pedro a few messages ago, but I discovered that Access has very poor math function. It has the exp function (e^x) but no function for raising a quantity to an arbitrary power. It has the sqr (square root) function but no function for squaring a number! And the StDev function doesn't seem to allow me to feed it a range of data points. What it wants is a field name and that's that. I could fiddle around with logs and such to get the result that Pedro wants, but sheesh! It's like going back to using a slide rule! I've decided that I've had enough of that kind of pie. I don't feel particularly clever this morning. Steve Erbach Neenah, WI On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:44:50 +1000, Stuart McLachlan <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg> wrote: > On 17 Jan 2005 at 19:35, Steve Erbach wrote: > > > Pedro, > > > > Just so I'm clear (I'm 52 years old; have a little pity for the aged), > > You young pups don't know nuttin. When you get to my age you have a better > chance of understanding. :-) > > > do you want what Stuart suggested? That is: > > > > For each pair of values that are used to generate an average, you want > > the standard deviation of that pair of data points? For two points the > > standard deviation is equal to the difference between one of the > > points and the average. So if the points are 8.4 and 9.3, the average > > is 8.85. The "standard deviation" would be 9.3 - 8.85 = 0.45. Is that > > what you want? I mean, it's easy enough to compute, but I'm having a > > hard time seeing how useful it is. > > > > I can see a possible use for it, it shows how alike the items are in each > pair. > > -- > Stuart -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com