Mark Breen
marklbreen at gmail.com
Wed Jan 19 10:17:25 CST 2005
Hello Steve, I had not seen those, so thanks for that. I does not eliminate the need to add the reference, but what it does suggest is that we should not have to actually install ADO, which is what we were trying to avoid. Thanks again. Mark On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:43:43 -0600, Steve Erbach <erbachs at gmail.com> wrote: > Mark, > > I suppose that you've seen these: > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;184233 > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;185033 > > Sorry I don't have any more to offer. > > Steve Erbach > Neenah, WI > > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:57:48 +0000, Mark Breen <marklbreen at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I just sent an email tell you about a new project that I have taken > > on. It is Access 97 and Oracle as the BE. > > > > We would like to use ADO for some stored procedures to avail of output > > parameters, but it is not desirable to have to reference ADO on five > > hundred PC's. Especially with different versions of the OS throughout > > the company. > > > > Is there a way that I can call this ADO, from a central database and > > pass the results back to the clients that are located throughout the > > company? Maybe MDA's? I know that if I use MDA's that I will have to > > reference them, but that might not be too bad because at least I can > > control the version. But that MDA will need the ADO reference. > > > > I have not really done any COM / DCOM work, but maybe some of you have > > and can think of a solution to this, > > > > The alternative is to try to rev the access db with new references to ado. > > > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > > > Mark > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >