Mark Breen
marklbreen at gmail.com
Wed Jan 19 10:19:34 CST 2005
Hello Drew, Not unless they are renamed themselves 02.ie and are a telco in Dublin :) Mark On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:08:03 -0600, DWUTKA at marlow.com <DWUTKA at marlow.com> wrote: > This wouldn't happen to be for Marlow Industries, would it? <grin> Sounds > like one of our systems. > > Drew > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Breen [mailto:marklbreen at gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 5:52 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: [AccessD] Access 97 Architecture with Oracle DB > > Hello All, > > I have taken a contract with a client that are using Access 97 and > Oracle for an enormous system. > > There are hundreds of tables, queries, pass through queries, linked > tables and all sorts of other stuff also in it. > > There is no documentation at all, no inline comments at all anywhere! > No framework of any sort and each form is created as a new form with > only small similarities to the existing ones! > > Error handling amounts to on error resume next ! > > I am seeking your suggestions as to how to continue to develop this > system with the future in mind. I am considering some way of using > the existing MDB to call new MDB's. These new MDB's will be created > and developed in a more sytematic way. Any comments you have on this > would be welcome. > > The current archecture is Oracle BE, with Access FE, but with lots of > local data in the FE also. At some stage in the future 12-18-24 > months, they may overhaul the entire system, but in the meantime, we > have to continue working with what we have. > > Thanks for your input. > > Mark > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >