Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Mon Jul 18 16:07:49 CDT 2005
Yes, that first one pretty much sums it up. :-> Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: Stuart McLachlan [mailto:stuart at lexacorp.com.pg] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 4:21 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] File Maker Pro vs. Access On 15 Jul 2005 at 8:56, Charlotte Foust wrote: > You can create some incredibly BAD applicatons in File Maker, how bad > depends on the version. :-< > > There is very little distinction in FileMaker between the GUI and the > data structures and only the latest version actually keeps all the > tables and "relationships" in a single file instead of separate files. > I'm not sure there ARE any "standard" occurrences in FileMaker, but > you can download a 30-day free trial of the latest version and play > with it to see how it behaves. It is enough to make any Access > developer fall to their knees in gratitude that they don't have to use > FileMaker! > See: http://advisorforums.com/dFileMaker001.nsf/0/28b623cbbee234d193b008918e2 948b 8?OpenDocument A bit old: http://www.techsoup.org/howto/articlepage.cfm?ArticleId=207&topicid=6 -- Stuart -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com