[AccessD] Access 2003, and ADPs

huh?

damn nobody mentioned this bug when I first asked about problems w/
Access 2003 (before I bought it...) I'm having buyer's remorse ;)

I did a bit of diggin around and if I start a new db, then I can go
into options and choose 2002-2003 format as the default. which is
nice. (i hope).

On 6/8/05, John W. Colby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote:
> I think it is just a continuation of the bug (never fixed) that prevents
> compacting any containers after 2K.  Thus the default is to build containers
> in the 2K format since they can be compacted.
> 
> John W. Colby
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
> 
> Contribute your unused CPU cycles to a good cause:
> http://folding.stanford.edu/
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Francisco Tapia
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 6:48 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: [AccessD] Access 2003, and ADPs
> 
> 
> I just got my copy of Access 2003 along w/ the Developer Extensions... IF I
> open up Access 2003 and create a blank ADP, I noticed in the title bar that
> the file format is in Access 2000 instead of Access 2003... did I
> misconfigure something?
> 
> 
> --
> -Francisco
> http://pcthis.blogspot.com |PC news with out the jargon!
> http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More...
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> 
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 


-- 
-Francisco
http://pcthis.blogspot.com |PC news with out the jargon!
http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More...