Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Wed Jun 29 10:36:29 CDT 2005
If they do, they should be Colbyized! <g> Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: Foote, Chris [mailto:Chris.Foote at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 7:51 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: RE: [AccessD] Fastest Way To Get Data Field From Recordset But it presumably will not die if someone has (cough) used a space in the name Charlotte? Regards Chris Foote - UK > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Charlotte > Foust > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:47 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: RE: [AccessD] Fastest Way To Get Data Field From Recordset > > > The first option is the slowest way. > > Charlotte Foust > > > -----Original Message----- > From: paul.hartland at fsmail.net [mailto:paul.hartland at fsmail.net] > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 7:37 AM > To: accessd > Subject: [AccessD] Fastest Way To Get Data Field From Recordset > > > To all, > > I have taken over a project and where I would normally use something > like > > strMinPayroll = rsMinPayroll.Fields("LowPayrollNo") > > it is written as > > strMinPayroll = rsMinPayroll!LowPayroll > > Is there a difference in speed with these, i.e. is one more efficient > than the other etc.... > > Thanks in advance for any help on this... > > Paul Hartland -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com