Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Wed Jun 29 10:36:29 CDT 2005
If they do, they should be Colbyized! <g>
Charlotte Foust
-----Original Message-----
From: Foote, Chris [mailto:Chris.Foote at uk.thalesgroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 7:51 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Fastest Way To Get Data Field From Recordset
But it presumably will not die if someone has (cough) used a space in
the name Charlotte?
Regards
Chris Foote - UK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Charlotte
> Foust
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:47 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: RE: [AccessD] Fastest Way To Get Data Field From Recordset
>
>
> The first option is the slowest way.
>
> Charlotte Foust
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: paul.hartland at fsmail.net [mailto:paul.hartland at fsmail.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 7:37 AM
> To: accessd
> Subject: [AccessD] Fastest Way To Get Data Field From Recordset
>
>
> To all,
>
> I have taken over a project and where I would normally use something
> like
>
> strMinPayroll = rsMinPayroll.Fields("LowPayrollNo")
>
> it is written as
>
> strMinPayroll = rsMinPayroll!LowPayroll
>
> Is there a difference in speed with these, i.e. is one more efficient
> than the other etc....
>
> Thanks in advance for any help on this...
>
> Paul Hartland
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com